Kaye Fallick

Kaye is a retirement commentator and coach, with 25 years’ experience writing about retirement income. She has authored two books on life stage changes – Get a New Life and What Next? – and enjoys regular radio and podcast appearances. Her favourite mission is to offer plain English explanations of complex rules so that all retirees can benefit. She is based in Melbourne but enjoys escaping to Italy whenever possible.
Aged care funding: Is your super up for grabs?

Aged care funding: Is your super up for grabs?

The Aged Care Taskforce report was finally released in mid-March. It answered some difficult questions and raised a whole lot more. The goal of the taskforce was to consider how aged care services might be funded more equitably and sustainably. Shortly before the release of the report, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese ruled out levies or taxes on the general population and changes to thresholds on the family home.

Most Australians hope to age at home. The taskforce needed to consider how to fund this fairly, while raising money to meet both increased demand and higher expectations of those who will experience residential aged care. This inevitably leads to a move towards more of a ‘user-pays’ system. Currently the portion of costs paid by those accessing care is (on average) 25% of ongoing residential care costs and 6% of home care costs. 

For home care, as recently summarised for Retirement Essentials by Aged Care expert Louise Biti, the different aspects of care (accommodation, daily expenses, cost of care and extras) will be supported by government, but everyday living expenses will require a higher level of self-funding. 

When it comes to residential care, the cost of accommodation and daily care expenses (including food, electricity and laundry etc) will be considered a personal expense and only those residents with low financial capacity will continue to be supported.

Lifetime income streams: Do they guarantee money for life?

Lifetime income streams: Do they guarantee money for life?

If you’re a 65-year old male reading this article you stand a good chance of living until at least 85.3 years. If you’re a female of the same age, you’re likely to get more than 20 years, with life expectancy of 88 (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare). Half of those reading (who are 65) will last even longer. Hopefully this means 20-plus years of health and fulfilling activities ahead.

Long life is great news, but many people often grapple with this concept of longevity as they worry how they might stretch their funds to cover these decades. As you will be well aware there are many different ways of accessing your super and private savings to support your needs in retirement. But working out the pros and cons of the different ways of withdrawing super can feel challenging. Today we discuss the various aspects of ‘lifetime income streams’ and how they can be used as part of your retirement funding mix.

When cash is trashed …

When cash is trashed …

The other day I needed a $100 note for a gift for someone. I didn’t have my purse with debit card on me, but I did have my phone which has my debit account App installed. So I popped into the bank and expected to be able to wave my phone as I do everywhere else, and to get the required cash. 

I was wrong, of course. They wouldn’t let me withdraw cash without a debit card. So I went next door to the supermarket and did it there. Do you also find this passing strange? It seems that cash is becoming ever scarcer and ways to access it are reducing rapidly.

Add to this the fact that the government has officially announced the end of paper cheques and you may start to wonder if you are being bullied into using electronic money transfer, or else.

Noel Whittaker wrote about this recently. He’s quite the guru when it comes to money matters, and he reported that in the 1980s cheques were enjoying their heyday, accounting for 85% of non-cash transactions. Today they account for 0.01%, which is a reason why they are being phased out by 2030. But this is a bit of a chicken and egg discussion, isn’t it? I stopped writing and receiving cheques because it became increasingly difficult to find a bank to cash them. Don’t even mention overseas cheques, which had such a surcharge on depositing them that most recipients were forced into agreeing to getting funds electronically instead.