Most of us are open to doing the maths and setting goals if we believe those goals are achievable. Resistance can set in, however, if we think that the targets are unrealistic. It could be that this has become the case with the commonly accepted quarterly ‘Retirement Standards’.
These Retirement Standards (published by the Association of Super Funds Australia or ASFA) were updated late last month, to reflect price changes through to 31 December 2023.
The Retirement Standard suggests two levels of retirement lifestyle; modest and comfortable.
The table below contains the suggested amounts required per week and per annum for those aged 65-84, for each of these retirement lifestyles.
Advocacy group, Super Consumers Australia (SCA) also shares targets for retiree spending. These targets have three levels, low, medium and high which are listed in the table. We’ve also included the full Age Pension rates (including supplements) and median super rates at Age Pension qualification age and when many Australians retire (ages 65-69).
The reason for including these seemingly conflicting amounts is to set the scene for a discussion about how YOU can work out what is a reasonable spending pattern in retirement and whether your current savings will allow you to maintain this cashflow level.
Comparative spending targets in retirement:
ASFA RETIREMENT STANDARD (March 2024) | ||||||
Modest Single | Comfortable single | Modest couple | Comfortable couple | |||
Per week | $626 | $982 | $900 | $1382 | ||
Per annum | $32,666 | $51,278 | $46,994 | $72,148 | ||
Suggested savings by age 67 to achieve this spending level | $100,000 | $595,000 | $100,000 | $690,000 |
AGE PENSION – FULL ENTITLEMENTS INCLUDING SUPPLEMENTS (20 March 20, 2024) | ||||||
Single | Couple | |||||
$29,024 | $43,753 |
SUPER CONSUMERS AUSTRALIA SPENDING LEVELS ( August 2023) | ||||||
Low single | Medium single | High single | Low Couple | Medium couple | High couple | |
Per week | $596 | $789 | $1058 | $846 | $1154 | $1539 |
Per annum | $31,000 | $41,000 | $55,000 | $44,000 | $60,000 | $80,000 |
Suggested savings by age 65 to achieve this spending level | $76,000 | $279,000 | $795,000 | $95,000 | $371,000 | $1,055,000 |
MEDIAN SUPER SAVINGS AGE 65-69 (ASFA, 2021) *most recent | ||||||
Female | $201,233 | |||||
Male | $213,986 |
It will be clear that we are not comparing ‘apples with apples’ with the ASFA and SCA targets. For a start, ASFA considers two levels of retirement lifestyle and SCA suggests three. One similarity, however, is that both sets of target spending and saving are based upon retirees fully owning their own home. No mortgage whatsoever. Yet we know the most recent research on mortgages at retirement age shows a sharp spike in this occurrence, to the extent that more than 50% of those aged 55-60 still have a mortgage. Both sets of targets for modest or low are at least $2000 or thereabouts higher than the full Age Pension for singles.
This begs the question whether these targets are useful for retirees, or just the shrinking number who are homeowners, with no debt whatsoever. The above spending guides have no allowance whatsoever for any debt repayment.
Yet debt is a pressing issue for many retirees and forms one of the big questions that many who are on the brink of retirement raise – should I use my super to reduce or pay off my mortgage? This is very practical consideration for a growing number of retirees. (If this concerns you, you may wish to consider a consultation with a Retirement Essentials adviser who can directly address the pros and cons of mortgage repayments, within the rules of the Age Pension and super).
ASFA notes (and SCA may also assume this) that the ‘typical’ retiree spending is based upon someone who is relatively healthy. Again, this is a big ‘if’ and might further reduce the useability of these targets.
Another assumption by ASFA is in regard to those aged 85 and older (see tables in ASFA link above). And this is that they neither own nor drive a car nor will ever travel overseas. I don’t know about the 85year-olds in your life, but many I know do not fit this assumption. There is also an assumption for those aged 65-69 living a ‘modest’ lifestyle, that they, too, will never travel abroad. Yet anecdotally speaking, many people living on a full or part-Age Pension still aspire to do so. And will go without and save up in order to live these dreams.
The ASFA comfortable targets have been called ‘aspirational’ by many commentators. Part of the problem is that the comfortable amounts are higher than the current median income ($67,600 per annum as of August 2023), before income tax and the Medicare Levy are deducted.
So where does this leave the regular retiree who would like to plan spending for the years to come, but does not quite fit the profile of a debt-free homeowner, by 85 no longer travelling, nor driving?
As noted earlier, using inappropriate targets can feel somewhat deflating and make it hard to anticipate what your own particular spending needs might be.
The good news is that there are other ways to work out your needs and how your own savings can contribute to cover them. The Organisation of Economic Development (OECD) uses a measure of 70% of your most recent pre-retirement earnings. Perhaps this will work for you? Or 80% or 65% depending upon the scope of your lifestyle aims and activities.
Separately, having accurate knowledge of your current spending, category by category, is very helpful. Reviewing your current household budget will allow you to anticipate changes in different categories as you spend more time at home, after full-time work.
You may or may not already receive the Age Pension. Working through your potential entitlement and the amount you will be paid is critical to understanding how your super might top up such an amount, and when you may need to access it.
The most important takeaway here is that financial targets and ideal spending rates can often be created for the ‘average’ retiree. But there is no such thing. Every retirement is different, every retiree will have different needs and that’s why understanding your own household budget and extrapolating from that base will often give you the most relevant answers.
You may also find it helpful to model how the Age Pension and super drawdowns will work for you across the years, factoring in your life expectancy and any lump sum withdrawals you plan to make. The Retirement Essentials safe spending simulator does exactly this. When used with the support of an adviser, it’s amazing how much clearer the projections can be.
What’s your story?
Many of the Retirement Essentials members have managed the transition to secure retirement income quite seamlessly. If you have too, please feel free to share your thoughts on how others might work through their likely retirement income needs.
The numbers ASFA puts out are highly inflated. As a retiree of 8+years who travels overseas frequently that is not my experience, even in this high inflationary environment.
My husband and I are in our mid to late 70’s and have been retired for many years with no mortgage.
I put $3000 per month into a joint debit card account and this pays all our expenses for our house, food and running a car plus 2 hours house cleaning per fortnight and to have our lawn mowed.
We then have some other money each to spend on whatever we choose, although doctors and prescriptions take up a chunk.
We take at least one holiday a year and it usually involves a cruise.
But we rarely eat out and never pay for coffees (we have a great automatic coffee machine at home).
These days we rarely need to buy many clothes or new appliances.
The best part is having no money worries makes your life stress free and therefore you are happier.
Hi Frances, many thanks for sharing how you manage your day to day and annual living expenses – it sounds like you have hit upon a great system to cover the necessaries, have a fun annual break, and reduce any potential bill stress. Impressive !!!! warmest Kaye
Yes of course everyone’s circumstances are different and the definition of a comfortable retirement can be like chalk and cheese.
The above table suggests that for a comfortable retirement a couple will require $72,148 per annum and a couple on full pension will receive $43,753 which is a difference of $28,395.
It also suggests that to fund the difference ($28,395 per annum) a couple will need a combined super fund of $690,000.
$690k would generate $34,500 per annum at a conservative 5%, therefore their super fund would actually grow and never run out
And before anyone mentions it, I understand that fees on the super fund have to be paid and the market can fluctuate
Hi William, you raise a valuable point. Many people will consider super savings, divide by years (life expectancy) and consider the amount per year as possible future income, without allowing for the earnings this super will generate over this period. Often people who withdraw very little (subject to required amounts of course) may find they have more left in account even though they are pulling down an income stream. This is where calculators can assist, to project, with CPI and Age Pension inputs included.
Quite frankly, the real elephant in the room is life expectancy. According to the Australian Life Tables, aged 72, my life expectancy ends at 82, not a problem for me.
However, the reality is I have no idea what my true life expectancy is, let alone that of my, marginally, younger wife.
Hi Robert – you are right – life expectancy is a major configuration. Our advisers can factor this into projections, which is helpful. I am not sure which ALT version you looked at, but when I look up a male of 72, I get life expectancy of nearly 14 more years … hopefully this will make your day – worth checking at least? warmest, Kaye
hi
is the OECD suggested percentage ( 65 -80) of most recent income, take home or gross income?
Hi David, thanks for your question. The OECD percentage is often quoted as 70%, as it covers the range of 65% to 80%. It refers to your most recent NET income, pre retirement – so your take home salary. It is a ‘rule of thumb’ and not a substitute for doing your own sums on your own typical expenditure. Hope this helps, warmest, Kaye